AgentProject
AgentProject
  • Welcome to the Agent Project
  • Topics
    • Which AI Agent framework to choose?
      • Evaluating Microsoft Autogen
    • Agent Framework Scorecard (Explained)
  • Exhaustive list of Agent Frameworks
  • 1. Foundation of Agent Projects
    • The key functional areas of an AI agent
    • Different Agent Workflow Implementation Patterns
    • How to use Outcome, Role and Interaction (ORI) to design AI Agents for your organization
  • Authors
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Understanding the ORI Design Hierarchy
  • Outcome-based design
  • Task-based agents
  • Goal-seeking agents
  • Role-based design
  • Interaction-based design
  1. 1. Foundation of Agent Projects

How to use Outcome, Role and Interaction (ORI) to design AI Agents for your organization

PreviousDifferent Agent Workflow Implementation PatternsNextAuthors

Last updated 2 months ago

In the rapidly evolving landscape of artificial intelligence, designing effective requires a structured methodology that balances complexity with predictability. The ORI (Outcome > Role > Interaction) design approach offers a systematic framework for architecting AI agent workflows that are both powerful and practical.

Understanding the ORI Design Hierarchy

The ORI design approach follows a hierarchical structure where each element builds upon the previous:

  1. Outcome: The desired result or objective of the agent system

  2. Role: The specific functions and responsibilities assigned to each agent

  3. Interaction: The protocols and patterns governing how agents communicate and collaborate

This hierarchy ensures that design decisions are driven by clear objectives rather than technological capabilities alone.

Outcome-based design

There are essentially only two outcome-based designs when you design AI agents.

Organizations typically start their AI agent journey with task-based agents due to their lower complexity and higher reliability.

Task-based agents

Task-based agents represent the foundation of practical AI implementation in most organizations. Their popularity stems from several key advantages:

  • Predictability: Well-defined task boundaries make behavior more deterministic

  • Measurability: Clear success criteria for task completion

  • Scalability: Easier to replicate and deploy across different contexts

  • Maintenance: Simpler to debug and optimize

A prime example of task-based architecture is the Monitoring Agent pattern. These agents are designed to:

  • Continuously observe specific metrics or systems

  • Process incoming data against predefined criteria

  • Trigger appropriate responses or alerts

  • Maintain audit trails of their observations and actions

Goal-seeking agents

Goal-seeking agents represent a more sophisticated approach to agent design, suitable for complex scenarios where the path to the desired outcome isn't clearly defined. These agents:

  • Operate with greater autonomy

  • Adapt to changing environmental conditions

  • Make decisions based on multiple variables

  • Collaborate dynamically with other agents

Key characteristics of goal-seeking agents include:

  1. Dynamic Strategy Formation: Agents can formulate and adjust their approaches based on environmental feedback

  2. Multi-Agent Collaboration: Complex goal achievement often requires coordinated effort among multiple specialized agents

  3. Environmental Awareness: Continuous monitoring and adaptation to changing conditions

  4. Learning Capabilities: Improvement of strategies based on past experiences

Here is an advanced type of goal-seeking agent which is useful for complex scenario use cases where the environment variables are unpredictable

Role-based design

Coming soon..

Interaction-based design

Coming soon...

agent workflow systems
Task based agents are going to be Organization favorites
A type of task based agent : Monitoring Agent
Goal seeking Agent
Simulation Agent, a type of Goal seeking Agent